Now that Big Pharmakeia's (Greek for Sorcery) patented viral mRNA genetic sequence ‘vaccine’ (covid-19 injections) has merged, distorted and corrupted your DNA are you now property of Big Pharma?
On June 13, 2013, in the case of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that human genes cannot be patented in the USA because DNA is a "product of nature." The Court decided that because nothing new is created when discovering a gene, there is no intellectual property to protect, so patents cannot be granted. Prior to this ruling, more than 4,300 human genes were patented. The Supreme Court's decision invalidated those gene patents, making the genes accessible for research and for commercial genetic testing.
However the Supreme Court's ruling does allow for manipulated DNA to be patentable because DNA sequences altered by humans are not found in nature. The Court specifically mentioned the ability to patent a type of DNA known as complementary DNA (cDNA). This synthetic DNA is produced from the molecule that serves as the instructions for making proteins (called messenger RNA [mRNA), e.g. the covid-19 'vaccines'.
Complimentary DNA (cDNA) is produced from mRNA genetic sequences within cells, that integrate with cellular DNA; the cells genetic genome. The consequence of manipulating a person's DNA through the covid-19 injections is that they become a transhuman.
Human Rights laws specifically state that “human beings” are born human and as such have rights under the law. For a “human organism” who was human at birth and with “human rights” this definition holds true. However, the “genetically modified offspring” of the patented human beings will technically be born as “non-human” or “transgenic” since their gene pool has been tarnished with viral genetic material and as “non-humans” they are thus patentable, which is to say; OWNED, they become PROPERTY, slaves at least have some rights, property has no rights.
“A gene patent is the exclusive rights to a specific sequence of DNA (a gene) given by a government to an individual, organization, or corporation who claims to have first identified the gene. Once granted a gene patent, the holder of the patent dictates how the gene can be used, in both commercial settings, such as clinical genetic testing, and in noncommercial settings, including research, for 20 years from the date of the patent. Gene patents have often resulted in companies having sole ownership of genetic testing for patented genes.”
Retroviruses such as HIV convert their RNA-based genomes into cDNA before they integrate into a host genome. So why did the Supreme Court not rule all types of human cellular DNA natural and therefore unpatentable. Perhaps Scalia had insight on what was coming down the line with viral mRNA ‘vaccines’, was he aware of the NWO plan involving the mass vaccination of citizens with patented biological material?
Viral Vector mRNA vaccines such as AstraZeneca and Pfizer’s & Moderna’s mRNA vaccines all have the capacity of “genomic integration” with host DNA. Both use viral mRNA segments that code for “spike protein” (e.g. they permanently program our DNA to replicate a dangerous protein) and operate on a similar delivery principle; AstraZeneca’s viral vector ‘vaccine’ delivers viral mRNA into human cells thereby initiating an ‘immunological response’. Whereas with the Pfizer and Moderna technology, the delivery of the viral mRNA segment is done using lipid nanoparticles.
It is clearly stated in this table from Sinobiologicals, a pharmaceutical company also producing ‘vaccines’, that one of the disadvantages with viral vector (mRNA) vaccines is the “Genomic integration of foreign DNA”; simply put, viral genetic material can integrate with the genetic material of the host itself… your DNA!
When the viral mRNA vaccine incorporates it’s viral genome into your DNA your tainted DNA is now considered a biological patent of the Pharmaceutical Company that provided you with the vaccine!
This begs the question, does this mean that everyone who has had the ‘vaccine’ is now technically owned and will be defined as “Trans-human” or “Transgenic”? And as such, do “Transgenic” individuals have rights under the law?
It was this notion of “patenting humans” that mobilized members of Congress to pass legislation prohibiting the issuance of patent claims “directed to or encompassing a human organism.” The values underlying this legislation was agreeable, yet its execution was deeply flawed and the potential outcomes, hazardous. The legislation’s numerous flaws include primarily, the lack of an agreed-upon definition of “human organism.”
The idea of “patenting humans” tends to evoke images of helpless fellow humans “tagged” with patent numbers whom are the property of someone, or some NWO Marxist/Communist regime or evil corporate entity. Many believe that patents convey property rights on “human organisms” which would allow the people that have been patented to be offered up for sale, used, abused and experimented upon, even euthanized (murdered). Some critics are rightfully concerned with the potential to erode human dignity and “play god.” All of which is true.
The U.S. Congress responded to the moral concerns with the America Invents Act (AIA); passed by Congress and was signed into law by Rothschild’s puppet, Barack Obama on September 16, 2011. Section 33 of the AIA states that “notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism.” This provision was intended to ban the patenting of “human beings” at any stage of development, including embryos, fetuses, human/non-human chimeras, and clones. However, the vague (ambiguous) wording of section 33 and the absence of a definition for “human organism,” will give courts wide latitude when interpreting section 33; whereas “human beings” would have had more of a legal standing than the term “human organism”, which has placed mankind at the same level of an amoeba.
The language of section 33 was originally proposed by Representative David Weldon in 2003 as an amendment to the Commerce-Justice-State Appropriations Bill. Responding to criticism from lobbyist groups opposing the amendment, Weldon said it was “absurd” that “patents on stem cell lines, procedures for creating human embryos, prosthetic devices, and . . . any drug or product that might be used in or for human beings would be affected by the amendment.” He argued before Congress that his amendment did nothing more than provide congressional backing for the USPTO’s (The United States Patent and Trademark Office is an agency in the U.S. Department of Commerce that issues patents) policy against patenting human beings.
Why did Weldon not define “human beings” in the Bill, after all he was a distinguished medical doctor and scientist. He knew there was definitely a difference between “human being” and “human organism”; one is Divine whereas the other is a laboratory test animal. Could it be his association with freemasonry or the fact that he was involved with secret societies like Phi Beta Kapa?
The Weldon amendment applies to patents on claims directed to or encompassing a “human organism” at any stage of development and includes: a human embryo, fetus, infant, child, adolescent, or adult, regardless of whether the organism was produced by technological methods. The term ‘‘human organism’’ includes an organism of the human species that has incorporated one or more genes taken from a nonhuman organism (i.e. viral genetic material). Some legal experts say that legally patening humans is entirely possible and all those containing biologically patented genes (recipients of the covid-19 injections) can indeed be patented.
The 2013 US Supreme Court Case: Pathology v Myriad Genetics, Inc. Stated: “People who are legally identified as “transhuman” do not have access to human rights or rights granted by the state. This is because they are not classified as 100% biological or human.” At the end of the decision, the Supreme Court ruled that if a human genome is modified by mRNA ‘vaccines’ (covid-19 injections), then the genome can be patented.
This means that everyone who has received the ‘vaccine’ is now technically “patented” and something that is patented is “proprietary” and will be included in the definition of “transhumans”.
People who are legally identified as ‘transhuman’ do not have access to human rights or rights granted by the state.
This is because they are not classified as fully biological or human. Therefore, technically, anyone whom has taken the covid-19 ‘vaccine’ no longer has access to human rights.
There is currently a patent related to the future of transhumans: Patent # WO2020060606 – CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA (yes, the patent does contain #666) The technology, created by Bill Gates, will be placed on your body and then a barcode will be assigned to it and attached to the cryptocurrency. The technology tracks your body activity and when you reach a “satisfactory amount of activity” your crypto-currency will be paid out.
What the New/One World Order Globalists are doing with these so-called 'vaccines' (Gene Editing/Cell Engineering Technology) is diabolical. Make no mistake, the covid-19 'vaccines' are a part of the Mark of the Beast.
Autonomy is lost in genetically modified embryos and children born to vaccinated parents, who are deemed “transgenic”. As such they no longer have rights under these patent laws. Should there be long-term health complications from these 'vaccines' a State may enact laws allowing for the legalization of mandatory abortions, sterilization and even… mass murder disguised as a caring practice of euthanasia.
Historically eugenics is how tyrannical regimes rid themselves of the “genetically unfit”, the elderly, or any group of people they deem sub-human. This is the NWO depopulation agenda; if the jab doesn’t kill you, they will.
Furthermore, if a “transgenic” organism were patented, the patent owner would have a right to prevent others from interacting with the patented “transgenic” as well as having the right to constrain the actions or free will of the “transgenic.” The transgenic would become property of the patent holder and could be transferred to another person through a sale of the patent.
Whether a “transgenic” person is property under the control of others will affect the likelihood and extent of experimentation performed upon it: because an owner need not ask property for its consent.
Anyone whom has taken the covid-19 injections has become property of the patent holder. For instance, anyone whom has taken the Moderna 'vaccine' is now property of Moderna and the US Government, since both of them own the patent.
Pray Repent Prepare
God Bless 🙏